Live:
Володимир Анатолійович Тарасенко
Володимир Анатолійович Тарасенко 3 hours тому: «Здравствуйте, Роман! цитата: «Утрата интереса к жизни, пустота и апатия» Примите мои слова сочувствия и поддержки! Расскажите, когда впервые почувствовали утрату интереса к жизн»
Володимир Анатолійович Тарасенко
Володимир Анатолійович Тарасенко 4 hours тому: «Юлия, Вы спрашивали цитата: «прошу помочь понять что со мной?» Помогли ли Вам ответы коллег? Может быть, что-то осталось невыясненным или не до конца понятым? Мне кажется, гл»
Ольга
Ольга 1 day тому: «Ваши желания и мысли, установки, будут меняться в течении всей жизни. Сейчас вы все еще формируетесь как личность, продолжаются закладываться кирпичики своего фундамента, границ, возможно поэтому чужо»

«Where do they come from?» On the origins of those for whom the law is not written.

Society

More from this author

Today, as the country is once again rocked by corruption scandals, people are asking themselves: “Where do these kinds of people come from?”

Why do people exist who completely disregard laws and moral norms? Why do they end up in leadership positions, deciding the fates of others, controlling resources and opportunities—and always for their own benefit, not for the people?

There are three key reasons:

So, the first factor is the family, where the core of such a personality is formed. Here, the child is forgiven for absolutely everything; every action is justified. The child is the main person in the family, and everyone else strives to serve their needs and whims. The parents are completely uncritical of the child’s behavior; they see no problems or mistakes—and therefore do not correct them. Instead of teaching the child to solve problems, they replace the development of social skills with their own omnipotence—Mom and Dad will “fix everything.”

Parents are often aggressive toward society and its representatives who try to point out their child’s flaws. If the child is selfish, capricious, cruel, vengeful, cunning, or manipulative, none of this will be heard, or it will be met with an angry reaction. As a result, a person grows up who believes “anything is allowed,” because at home, it always was—without any moral brakes or restraints, acting however they please, simply because they want to and can. In other words, a person dangerous to society is raised, though the parents may not yet realize that, sooner or later, this will affect them too.

When such a child grows up, life can harshly “ground” them, because the permissiveness they enjoyed at home is unacceptable anywhere else.

But it can also go differently: parents “with connections” provide their child with a social elevator, backed by financial means, and suddenly, they are at the “top of the food chain.” To the surprise and misfortune of those around them, their fate now rests in the hands of an immature and morally corrupted person who, from an early age, has been taught to divide people into “categories,” always placing themselves in the highest one.


The second factor is a certain environment that deforms a person, distorting their values. This could be friends with a harmful influence, or it could be colleagues, a professional environment, or the so-called “system,” which either breaks you, pushes you out, or makes you part of itself. This explains the seemingly paradoxical cases where a person starts life as decent, with a desire for justice, but gradually transforms into something completely opposite: a cynical, unprincipled individual, because others in the “system” simply do not survive.


The third factor is societal: people are prone to easily believing in simple solutions and promises, paying attention to the loudest and most visible—those who offer quick success without effort or responsibility. People tend to grasp at straws in times of danger, without examining who is offering them. And so, these are the individuals who usually win elections, seize the largest resources, and secure the best opportunities. They feel like the masters of life and behave accordingly.

Life, however, often laughs at them, allowing them to rise high—because the higher you climb, the more painful the fall. And sometimes, life turns the wheel of justice in the next generation—through their children. This happens with particularly inadequate individuals who never learn their lessons firsthand.


What can we all do to ensure that these “flowers of life” do not end up at the top? That they do not cause harm with their incompetence and ignorance, multiplied by arrogance and lack of principles?

There is only one way—think critically. And, in general, bother to think.

Choose your social circle critically.
Make life choices—and there are so many of them—by analyzing events, their causes, and consequences, not emotions.
Do not elect to power people you know nothing about, people with unclear or shady pasts, questionable social circles, or a reputation for dishonesty or unprofessionalism.
Take the time to find out information, dig deeper, and analyze.
Do not fall for manipulation—and to do this, it is worth raising your own level of culture and awareness. Only then will they have minimal chances.

And isn’t that the least we can do?

Published on:

Comments 9
Comment
Translated from RU
Different wankers, Andryushas, Rustemchiks, Timurchiks and others are already born like this - narcissistic-liars-greedy-thieves-power-hungry and upbringing has nothing to do with it - that's an outdated and unconfirmed theory from the past century. I worked with children of different ages and observed clear signs of narcissism (NOT childish) in children as young as 3-5 years old who would cheat-manipulate-be greedy-robbing other children (conditionally normal ones).

Narcissism is a congenital disorder and only those born like this can be such moral freaks. It's NOT acquired.

As for elections and the responsibility of people who chose such...well, a narcissist knows how to please people and it's very hard to recognize him at first, but later his horns will definitely show up, but it will already be too late to do anything.

And what can be done if one narcissist is the main one, covers others and closes the investigation. And even worse, he incites services to find a mythical "enemy" trace - so that they would look for discontented ones - and more importantly, who directed him? And how this someone desperately clings to power and leads the country - and does this country matter to him if his home is in the misty Albion and he has guarantees of flying there soon?

Narcissism in its most disgusting form.

And the people, if they were wise, would not go out on various coup d'état maydays, wouldn't be led by provocations and manipulations, and there would be no victims, neither then nor now.
Author Translated from UK
Pavlo, if we are talking about people with all those manifestations that are collectively called 'psychopaths' (which is not a diagnosis by the way), then - yes, it's innate.

Here we are talking about something else - about the destructive influence of family and environment, and in the case of psychopathic personality structure, the seed simply falls into well-prepared soil.

But even a completely normal person can be made inadequate through such upbringing. Therefore, let's not confuse them with scoundrels with 'innate features', because finding such an excuse in this case means tolerating destructive upbringing.

Both (psychopaths) and the latter (mini chereshennyks), unfortunately, are part of our reality.

As for your political views and comments on the UKRAINIAN site regarding 'coup d'état maidans', still in Russian after so many years of war - it's masterfully ridiculous, of course. Commenting on such things would only spoil them, so let the readers make their own judgment.
Translated from RU
It's very unfortunate, Natalia, that as a psychologist you can't distinguish between a narcissist and a psychopath. For me, the truth was quite predictable after reading your article.

Psychopathy, like narcissism, is not a diagnosis but a personality disorder with its own characteristics. It's destructive and dangerous for others and it's innate, not acquired or trained.

And yes, you have the right to disagree.

Now, regarding political views...

I'm one of those who never follows the crowd or majority (and politically I'm an anarchist if you know what that means), precisely because the majority often makes mistakes. In several interviews on this site about recent events in 2013-2014:

Possible revolution in Ukraine? https://upsihologa.com.ua/interview/109

Last events in the country https://upsihologa.com.ua/interview/111

'Don't let yourself live in times of change' https://upsihologa.com.ua/interview/113

Present and future of Ukraine https://upsihologa.com.ua/interview/117

I expressed my non-mainstream, psychological views, which everyone can read for themselves.

And I believe I was right in my views - further developments only confirm this. But proud people (who are often also narcissists) don't have the strength to admit their mistakes...

As for the language I speak, regardless of war or anything else, according to democratic rules, a person has the right to speak any language, and imposing or banning it is a violation of Ukraine's constitution.

By the way, German wasn't banned in any country during World War II. Maybe because governments and nations were smarter and less narcissistic and primitive than they are now? After all, equating Nazism with great German culture would be barbaric stupidity. Who else but barbarians are those who burn books and destroy monuments and fight against the great Russian culture (which is valued worldwide) and the Russian language?
Author Translated from UK
Pavlo, do not justify yourself. This is a weak position.

And do not promote yourself so insistently.

I understand that all this was written for the sake of listing your works and emphasizing your views, but find another audience.
Translated from RU
And I did not intend to justify myself.

Why make unfounded accusations?

Or is this a way to shift blame onto someone else and avoid uncomfortable questions because there are no answers?

How narcissistic is that))

This was written because this piece cannot be called psychological, at best it's quasi-psychological and quasi-pedagogical journalism.

I dropped the interview links - to avoid being unfounded like some psychologists, so people can read other smart psychologists in those interviews (and they answered even more precisely than me) and understand that many psychologists saw the true picture of what's happening - the coup by the corrupt opposition. But who listened to them?!

So "we have what we have".
Translated from RU
This was written because this psychological article cannot be called psychological, at best it is quasi-psychological and quasi-pedagogical journalism, not more


Therefore, commenting on such an article is a questionable advertisement.

Moreover, writing something like this is also questionable.
Author Translated from UK
Why do you waste your precious time on this? In several posts from you - there is depreciation and transition to personal attacks, self-promotion. If it's not worth your attention - move on. But no, you write a huge post with a list of your materials, respond at midnight - but all this is exclusively because you don't care and the article is not on your level anyway. There can be no answers to your questions because there are no questions, just your monologue with yourself. Moreover, in Russian. Of course, you have the right to speak it, but others also have the right not to listen and not to read what is associated with hostility and aggression. It sounds like that too. Don't waste time and emotions on a response, because I won't read it - it's really not interesting. But those who are interested for professional reasons - screenshots were sent. Take care.
Translated from UK
Where does all this hatred, venom, and dirt come from in people?! Although it's always abundant in narcissists. Fact.

Don't waste your time and emotions on a response because I won't be reading it anyway - it's not interesting.


I wasn't writing for you anyway - what's the point of talking to someone who is deaf and incapable of dialogue? Not even mentioning lack of professionalism.

You write a huge post with a list of your materials, respond at half past two in the morning - but it's all just because it's not up to your level anyway, isn't it.


Regarding how a narcissist, self-centered, primitive, and shallow makes his fabricated, nonsense conclusions.

Kyiv was under fire (as seen on the news), so there wasn't time for sleep. That's why I came to the site and responded to your lies and slander. Or do I not have the right to defend myself from such? After all, like any narcissist, you're good at defaming anyone.

And those who are interested due to professional obligations - screenshots sent.


It seems Ukraine has turned into a country of shortsighted, vengeful, and malicious narcissistic informers...well, what a mess.
Translated from RU
It seems Ukraine has turned into a country of shortsighted, vengeful and mean narcissistic informers...well, that's unfortunate.


Where do they come from?
To comment, please log in or register. Log in / Register